Expert Panel on Covid Vaccine Injuries



This panel discussion put together by Sen. Ron Johnson of the United States features vaccine injury victims as well as scientists and members of the medical community who have declined to blindly follow the narrative. The horrendous stories of the victims bring to light the apathy and complicity of the wider medical community as well as the extreme fear of retribution for calling out the holes in the narrative. Attorney Aaron Siri Esq goes into detail (3:19) about what he has witnessed and experienced in this regard.

The NEJM paper on AstraZeneca's Phase 3 data published recently surprisingly shows the incidence of the well known adverse event VITT as being similar between the vaccine and placebo groups. Does it not sound too good to be true? Anyone not used to critically evaluating clinical data - or even scientific publications in general - may just brush it off as good news. For me, it triggered a small spark of curiosity that compelled me to dig more. 

Combine that with Brianne Dressen's testimony (2:40) where she alleges she is one of the 180 participants from the vaccine group who "withdrew" from the trial after the administration of the first dose(Table1). Only that she did not withdraw in the regular sense of the word; she was allegedly kicked out of the trial after she developed paresthesia and other debilitating symptoms soon after the first dose. 

"Because my symptom was severe, Astra Zeneca told me I was not allowed to get the second dose. They dropped me from the trial; my data was lost; I was excluded from the trial results; my access to the trial app was deleted. This is different from what is found in the report, which says that these individuals chose to forego the second dose"

I have now written to the corresponding author Dr. Tonya Villafana requesting a breakdown of withdrawn participants by reason for withdrawal, and just received a generic response outlining how to request clinical data through a portal after signing up. Apparently, they are committed to information sharing, but it may take up to one year to respond! I will keep the progress updated here. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding disease spread - the underlying math

A fundamental issue when it comes to understanding pandemics - and epidemiology in general - is the crucial role of mathematics combined with the lack of math skills among the majority of "specialists" involved in disease control, general medicine, policy and even medical research. This follows through to the general public, who are bombarded with various opinions and analyses from these specialists and an uncoordinated response from the government. Ironically, a random computer scientist would be able to grasp the theoretical basis of the equations below than your family doctor. The basic reproduction ratio, R 0 = 1 + rΤ; where r is the intrinsic growth rate, and T the mean generation interval. r can be estimated by Poisson regression of the epidemic curve. The "final size" or the proportion of the population that will eventually get infected can be estimated by solving the following for  χ. ln(1 - χ ) + R 0 χ = 0 By the way, Prof Neil Furguson and associa
Read more

Pandemic?

The Australian government has now declared it a pandemic, which by itself is a good thing as it is high time it was taken seriously. It remains to be seen what actual measures will be put in place, given the overall lax standard that prevailed in the country until now.  I will post my experience as a traveler within the last six weeks, retrospectively, looking at how different governments started reacting to the impending crisis and also my premonitions as an epidemiologist, as well as what we can and must all do to keep ourselves safe for months to come.
Read more