COVID-19

Preventive medicine displays all 3 elements of arrogance.  First, it is aggressively assertive , pursuing symptomless individuals and telling them what they must do to remain healthy. Occasionally invoking the force of law (immunizations, seat belts), it prescribes and proscribes for both individual patients and the general citizenry of every age and stage.  Second, preventive medicine is presumptuous , confident that the interventions it espouses will, on average, do more good than harm to those who accept and adhere to them.  Finally, preventive medicine is overbearing , attacking those who question the value of its recommendations.

This panel discussion put together by Sen. Ron Johnson of the United States features vaccine injury victims as well as scientists and members of the medical community who have declined to blindly follow the narrative. The horrendous stories of the victims bring to light the apathy and complicity of the wider medical community as well as the extreme fear of retribution for calling out the holes in the narrative. Attorney Aaron Siri Esq goes into detail (3:19) about what he has witnessed and experienced in this regard. The  NEJM paper on AstraZeneca's Phase 3 data  published recently surprisingly shows the incidence of the well known adverse event VITT as being similar between the vaccine and placebo groups. Does it not sound too good to be true? Anyone not used to critically evaluating clinical data - or even scientific publications in general - may just brush it off as good news. For me, it triggered a small spark of curiosity that compelled me to dig more.  Combine that with